About user-bccsa

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far user-bccsa has created 713 blog entries.

ADJUDICATION NO: 04/A/2017 – DOWN SYNDROME SOUTH AFRICA AND OTHERS – DIGNITY

Thirteen complaints were lodged with the BCCSA against East Coast Radio (ECR)  regarding a comment made by a presenter, Phat Joe, during his show on 15th February at 17:15 and again on 20 February.  The Registrar decided to entertain only seven of the complaints since it contained specific information as required by our Rules. CLICK [...]

By | 2017-03-16T10:01:59+00:00 March 16th, 2017|East Coast Radio|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 04/A/2017 – DOWN SYNDROME SOUTH AFRICA AND OTHERS – DIGNITY

CASE NUMBER:04/2017 – NTHUSETSANG VS SABC SAFM – NEWS REPORTS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN EXPLICIT

A complaint was lodged about the content of two news bulletins which was broadcast on the PM Live show at 17:00 and 18:00 respectively. In the first bulletin it was reported that a serial rapist was convicted and reference was made to the fact that he raped a pregnant woman. The second bulletin contained a [...]

By | 2017-03-16T09:50:20+00:00 March 16th, 2017|SABC Radio|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER:04/2017 – NTHUSETSANG VS SABC SAFM – NEWS REPORTS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN EXPLICIT

CASE NUMBER 01/2017 – BUSCH VS CARTE BLANCHE – RIGHT TO REPLY

This is a complaint about a broadcast by Carte Blanche in which the Complainant, a public figure and television personality was portrayed not to be the person he claimed to be, namely a lover of big cats and conservationist, but in fact a person who ill-treated his animals. The Complainant alleged that the Broadcaster did [...]

By | 2017-03-09T09:58:32+00:00 March 9th, 2017|M-Net|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER 01/2017 – BUSCH VS CARTE BLANCHE – RIGHT TO REPLY

CASE NUMBER: 16/2016 – MLENGA VS eNCA – News – Misleading

The complaint concerns the alleged misleading through a translation of a Zulu language expression to the English language by the Broadcaster, thereby not likely to convey the proper message of the plight of community members. The applicable clause 11 of the Code determines that news must be truthful, accurate and reported in a fair manner [...]

By | 2017-02-08T10:32:11+00:00 December 1st, 2016|E-TV|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 16/2016 – MLENGA VS eNCA – News – Misleading

CASE NUMBER: 15/2016 – ERASMUS VS JACARANDA FM 94.2 – CHILDREN

The complaint was a about the programme where a member of the public confessed to having had a sexual threesome with the bridesmaid and the bride’s sister one hour before his wedding. Jacaranda FM is an adult radio station and the broadcast was held to fall within the boundaries of freedom of expression. Semble: The [...]

By | 2017-01-27T11:46:27+00:00 December 1st, 2016|JacarandaFM 94.2|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 15/2016 – ERASMUS VS JACARANDA FM 94.2 – CHILDREN

CASE NUMBER: 17/2016 – SHIVAMBU vs SABC CHANNEL 404 – BALANCE

omplaint that in a news/comment programme the Broadcaster failed to invite someone with knowledge of the Vatsonga to challenge the statements by the Deputy Minister of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs on this topic.  This programme was titled a news programme but listeners and viewers were invited to phone in and comment on the subject [...]

By | 2017-01-27T11:46:27+00:00 November 25th, 2016|SABC News Channel|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 17/2016 – SHIVAMBU vs SABC CHANNEL 404 – BALANCE

CASE NUMBER: 18/2016 – TIMILE vs RAINBOW COMMUNITY RADIO – BALANCE

This is a complaint against a broadcast by a Christian Broadcaster for the way in which it conducted its so-called Thanks-Give-A-Thon drive for donations. Broadcaster, being a non profit organisation legally entitled to solicit donations from the public. Broadcaster also has the right to freedom of expression.  The Complainant described the donations drive of the [...]

By | 2017-01-27T11:46:27+00:00 November 3rd, 2016|RAINBOW FM|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 18/2016 – TIMILE vs RAINBOW COMMUNITY RADIO – BALANCE

CASE NUMBER: 12/2016 – MONTSHO VS e.tv – LANGUAGE

The Registrar received a complaint wherein the word “msunu” was included in a pre-recorded broadcast by the Respondent. The time of broadcast was 10h00 on a Sunday morning. It was not disputed that the word is grossly offensive and cannot have any other meaning than that of referring to female genitalia in a vulgar and [...]

By | 2017-01-27T11:46:27+00:00 October 23rd, 2016|E-TV|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 12/2016 – MONTSHO VS e.tv – LANGUAGE